Upgrading Strategies For Hospitals

(Golden Jubilee Hospital)

Group Project undertaken as part of the Renewable Energy Systems and the Enviornment MSc 2010
image

Contents

Homepage

BOSCAAR

General Hospitals

The Golden Jubilee Hospital

SWOT Analysis

SBEM Model

ESP-r Model

Financial Analysis

Future Strategies

The Group

Acknowledgements

SWOT Analysis

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Strengths

  • Most Efficient of the 3 types of Heat Pump
  • Good Energy Efficiency, between 2 and 4.9 times the input energy produced
  • Runs from electrical grid, does not require other resource supply

Weaknesses

  • High Installation Costs
  • Take up facility ground space
  • Will not work in section of building with existing radiators
  • Needs supplement to bring DHW to 60 degrees C

Opportunities

  • There is spare ground on site that could be used
  • Can be used with Air Conditioning System

Threats

  • Gas costs are similar 3.5p / 4p per kW
  • More developed technologies available

Water Source Heat Pumps

Strengths

  • Relatively low installation costs
  • Good Energy Efficiency, between 2 and 4.9 times the input energy produced
  • Runs from electrical grid, does not require other resource supply

Weaknesses

  • High Maintenance Costs?
  • Requires damage protection
  • Will not work in section of building with existing radiators
  • Needs supplement to bring DHW to 60 degrees C.

Opportunities

  • There is a river on site that could be used
  • Can be used with Air Conditioning System

Threats

  • May have trouble with river use due to environmental issues
  • Gas costs are similar 3.5p / 4p per kW
  • More developed technologies available

Air Source Heat Pumps

Strengths

  • Low Installation Costs
  • Good Energy Efficiency, between 2 and 4.9 times the input energy produced
  • Runs from electrical grid, does not require other resource supply

Weaknesses

  • Least Efficient of the 3 types of Heat Pump
  • Will not work in section of building with existing radiators
  • Needs supplement to bring DHW to 60 degrees C.

Opportunities

  • Boiler room placement should give high efficiency
  • Can be used with Air Conditioning System

Threats

    Gas costs are similar 3.5p / 4p per kW
  • More developed technologies available

Fuel cells

Strengths

  • High efficiency (80% for CHP)
  • Hot Module from CFC Solutions: 90%. Electrical efficiency: 47%
  • Can be discreetly sited to fit within a building's design in either an interior mechanical room or outside
  • Can provide electricity and heat hot water (CHP, heat at 400C for CFC Solution)
  • Runs 24/7. Net metering to sell surplus to the grid.
  • CFC HotModule: Low maintenance

Weaknesses

  • Initial cost?
  • Integration to the existing electrical and hydronic system?
  • How does it behave on long term?
  • UK contractor?

Opportunities

  • can converts natural gas, propane, and eventually biofuels
  • In case of grid interruption the system automatically switches to operate in a grid-independent mode
  • Provide a significant net reduction in CO2 (30% for HotModule). No SO2 and no NOx (hot module from CFC Solutions)
  • Incentives from the regulator???
  • With an additional steam turbine electrical efficiency can be improved from 47% to 65% (hot module from CFC Solutions)

Threats

  • Gas supplies are a finite resource. Global supplies of gas are reducing and current usage is unsustainable
  • Gas is an unstable resource
    • UK already net Importer
    • Prices often fluctuate and this is controlled by eastern European countries / Russia
  • Opposition from mature technologies
  • Fuel Grants???

Standard Cladding Options

Strengths

  • Passive Method of Improving Energy Demand
  • Reduces Energy Usage � reduces the demand for fossil fuels etc
  • Waterproofs the outer layer of the building
  • No additional resource used after initial installation - Fixed Environmental Affect

Weaknesses

  • Does not generate any energy
  • Potential leaks in the cladding could result in water ingress
  • Requires a large amount of material resource
    • Plastic, metal or alternative cladding?
  • High cost if the building surface area is large?
  • Removing current cladding may leave areas of building exposed to weather conditions

Opportunities

  • Can reduce the energy wastage
    • Reduced heat loss so reduced heating requirement
  • More reliable technology than all of the alternatives
    • Modern cladding options available but no reliability issues generated by this
  • Will modernise building�s exterior � aesthetic benefits
  • Can assist with making other options more viable
    • Example could be that a heat pump may meet all of the buildings heat requirements if combined with new cladding where as it may not meet the required needs with current cladding

Threats

  • Does not remove the current requirement for Gas heating alone
  • Removing current cladding may leave areas of building exposed to weather conditions whilst work is undertaken
  • Current Cladding will be required to be disposed of in a suitable manner
  • Air tightness improvements may make a slightly reduced level of impact but at a much reduced cost

Alternative Cladding Options (Liquid Plastic Coating)

Strengths

  • Waterproof
  • Can be easily patched and altered
  • Can be used as cladding, pipework coating & protective layer
  • Guarantee so maintenance proof for period
  • Can be used as local cladding seal

Weaknesses

  • Costly option for Cladding
  • Plastic is not environmentally friendly material
  • May not be perceived as an aesthetically pleasing material

Opportunities

  • Option to act as cladding improvement on localised area and thus may be a reasonable priced option with limited work involved
  • Could be used to make improvements to the piping network & guttering that normal cladding cant
  • Reduced maintenance which could mean payback will be achieved despite the initial capital cost
  • Could provide non-slip layer for the roof whilst acting as cladding & Waterproofing

Threats

  • Could be costly option for full clad and could be deemed unnecessary if standard full clad option is undertaken
  • May not be deemed a suitable option with regards to fire safety etc due to chemical plastic substance
  • May be deemed an unsustainable option

CHP (Combined Heat & Power) with Natural Gas

Strengths

  • CHP technology is technologically and economically proven
  • Technology can be applied to all scales
  • Greenhouse Gases are reduced
  • Technology can be retrofit
  • As an existing technology, it can start reducing carbon emissions today

weakness

  • CHP markets are in an early stage of development in the UK
  • The most efficient application is for district heating networks

Opportunities

  • CHP can help deal with the waste, heat and energy needs of any country
  • Biogas could be utilised in the future to further advance the enviornmental impact

Threats

  • CHP has strong dependencie on Gas prices are are not particularly stable
  • Natural Gas is a finite resource and as a result will not be a completly long term solution as more usage such as CHP will drive up costs

CHP with Biogas

Strengths

  • AD & CHP technology is technologically and economically proven
  • Technology can be applied to all scales
  • Greenhouse Gases are reduced
  • Technology can be retrofit
  • Biogas can be used in duel-fuel engines with minimal modification
  • As an existing technology, it can start reducing carbon emissions today

weakness

  • AD & CHP markets are in an early stage of development in the UK
  • The most efficient application is for district heating networks
  • Biogas is explosive and needs to be stored carefully
  • AD process can be quite slow at start up and shut down
  • Biogas requires scrubbing treatments to make it a clean fuel

Opportunities

  • AD & CHP can help deal with the waste, heat and energy needs of any country
  • Biogas CHP can contribute toward the Part L RenewablesObligation
  • Biogas CHP could enhance local community stewardship
  • Increases in landfill tax will make AD more appealing
  • Waste anaerobicallydigested can help towards landfill diversion targets

Threats

  • Not part of the UK energy framework � potential for biogas CHP to be over looked
  • Competing against a wide range of more well known and established technologies
  • Public perceptions of energy from waste currently poor
  • Potential public opposition to AD plants
  • Waste processed by AD does not currently count towards local authority targets

Renewable Energy Systems & The Environment

Group Project

It is the hope of the Energy Systems and Environment project team that the information contained in this website will contribute to the relevant field. Please feel free to use any of the findings presented to further your own study, making due acknowledgement where appropriate.